Understanding the Purpose of the SOW
A Statement of Work (SOW) is one of the most critical, yet often underestimated, documents in any professional services contract. While the master agreement—such as a Master Services Agreement (MSA) or Professional Services Agreement (PSA)—establishes the overarching legal framework, it is the SOW that sets out the operational roadmap. It specifies exactly what will be delivered, how and when it will be delivered, and at what cost. When drafted well, the SOW protects both parties, eliminates ambiguity, and reduces the risk of disputes or cost overruns. When drafted poorly, it can undermine the protections negotiated in the master agreement, create confusion, and lead to costly litigation.
The SOW’s Scope and Role in the Contract
An SOW should define the “what” of the engagement. It outlines the services, deliverables, milestones, acceptance criteria, payment terms, and other operational details that govern performance. Ideally, it contains only business terms, leaving legal terms to the master agreement—unless the circumstances demand otherwise, such as in a one-off project requiring unique security protocols or intellectual property provisions. Precision matters. Courts have consistently held that a contractor is only responsible for delivering what is expressly set forth in the SOW; if it is not written down, it will not be delivered.
Why Poorly Drafted SOWs Fail
Despite its importance, the SOW is one of the most frequent sources of project failure. Poorly drafted SOWs can result from over-reliance on vendor proposals, leaving key terms undefined, allowing lengthy lists of vendor “assumptions” to shift risk to the customer, including terms that conflict with the master agreement, or deferring the drafting of essential schedules, specifications, or acceptance criteria. Each of these missteps erodes clarity, weakens the customer’s negotiating leverage, and increases the likelihood of disputes.
A Structured Approach to Drafting
Experienced practitioners recommend a systematic approach to SOW drafting. The process begins with ensuring the document is truly an SOW and not simply a repurposed sales proposal. Key terms should be defined in a manner consistent with the master agreement, avoiding any language that could create internal conflicts. The level of detail must be sufficient for a neutral third party—such as a judge or arbitrator with no prior knowledge of the deal—to understand the intended outcomes and obligations. Assumptions should be treated carefully; rather than allowing broad disclaimers, they should be converted into explicit requirements that assign responsibilities clearly. Proactive project management should be built into the SOW through schedules, reporting structures, and escalation procedures. Fees should be tied to objective milestones, with limits on reimbursable expenses and rate increases. Finally, change orders should be used sparingly; if they become the primary tool for managing the project, it often signals that the initial SOW was inadequate.
CLICK HERE to read the full article.
Want to learn more? Join us for our upcoming webcast, Drafting Statements of Work: Create Successful Terms and Conditions, on September 16, 2025! To learn more about this program and to register for the webcast, click here.
To find our more about ALI CLE’s in-person courses or webcasts, or to check out on-demand CLE, click here.